Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Why Do We Need A Raced Base Party If We Can Have A Multiracial Party?



I have always been thinking on the relevance on having a race base party when we can have a multi-racial party than can serve all races without discrimination or favouritism. I never manage to fully understand this until recently when 'it' came to my senses :



  1. A race base party like UMNO/MCA/MIC and the rest of Barisan Nasional component can serve their respective race with more sensativity to it's race needs. By focusing on this,i believe a better results can be achieve as the focus is on respective races by it's party.

  2. Then come in Barisan Nasional that serves as the vehicle at the state & federal level with their agenda to improve and grow this country into an economic stability paradise without neglecting the needs of its respective race the party represent.

  3. A multi racial party won't we able to achieve this if they are focusing on all races at one time.Yes,results may be achieve by this but in terms of quality achievement to the respective race,i have my doubts.

All of us wants to live in Peace & Harmony. But to achieve this,one needs to understand the value of Independance & Freedom our country has been enjoying.

1 Malaysia


‘1 MALAYSIA’


Disediakan Oleh: Bahagian Penerbitan Dasar Negara


Rakyat Malaysia terdiri daripada pelbagai kaum dan agama perlu menganggap diri mereka sebagai bangsa Malaysia yang berfikir dan bertindak ke arah mencapai satu matlamat. Sejajar dengan ini, perpaduan yang sedia terjalin antara kaum di negara ini perlu diperkukuhkan lagi bagi mewujudkan suasana negara yang lebih aman, maju, selamat dan makmur.


Konsep 1 Malaysia yang diperkenalkan oleh YAB Dato Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak, Perdana Menteri, adalah langkah yang bertepatan dengan suasana dan cita rasa rakyat.


Konsep ini selari dengan apa yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan Prinsip-Prinsip Rukun Negara 1 Malaysia membawa aspirasi untuk memperbaiki hubungan kaum bagi memastikan rakyat Malaysia dapat menjalin perpaduan yang lebih erat.


Perkara asas yang perlu diwujudkan dalam semangat perpaduan adalah perasaan hormat menghormati, keikhlasan dan sikap saling mempercayai antara kaum. ‘1 Malaysia’ juga akan mewujudkan sebuah kerajaan yang mengutamakan pencapaian berpaksikan keutamaan rakyat sebagai mana slogan YAB Perdana Menteri iaitu ‘Rakyat didahulukan, Pencapaian diutamakan’.


‘1 Malaysia’ memerlukan kepimpinan dan rakyat yang berintegriti tinggi. Sifat jujur, berkebolehan, bercakap benar, telus, ikhlas dan amanah amat penting untuk melaksanakan tanggungjawab kepada negara.


1 Malaysia memerlukan pemimpin yang bijak mentafsir dan memahami tugasan yang diberi. Pemimpin cemerlang dan komited sewajarnya memiliki kebolehan yang tinggi dalam merancang, mengatur strategi, menilai prestasi dan menepati masa dalam memberi perkhidmatan yang terbaik kepada rakyat.


Kesungguhan dan komitmen terhadap tugas dan tanggungjawab menjadi asas atau senjata paling ampuh dalam mencapai sesuatu kejayaan. Negara memerlukan rakyat yang berdedikasi dan komited untuk melaksanakan tugas dan tanggungjawab dengan penuh iltizam, azam dan tekad demi kepentingan dan kemajuan negara.


Malaysia juga memerlukan pemimpin yang mesra rakyat dan sanggup berkorban masa, tenaga dan kewangan serta mengetepikan kepentingan peribadi demi negara Malaysia. Pemimpin yang bekerja dengan penuh dedikasi dan hati yang ikhlas akan mendapat sokongan dan dihormati oleh semua lapisan masyarakat.


Semua kaum perlu mengutamakan kesetiaan dan kepentingan kepada negara mengatasi kesetiaan kepada kaum dan kelompok sendiri. Negara ini adalah negara untuk semua rakyat, tanpa mengira kaum, agama, budaya serta fahaman politik. Semua kaum perlu menganggap bahawa mereka adalah bangsa Malaysia di mana segalanya perlu dinikmati secara bersama. Malaysia adalah negara kita di mana tidak ada masyarakat atau kaum yang akan dipinggirkan daripada menikmati pembangunan dan pembelaan daripada kerajaan.


1 Malaysia adalah pemangkin kepada pengwujudan negara bangsa yang dapat membina Malaysia sebagai negara yang mempunyai sikap kesamaan dan kekitaan di kalangan rakyat. Keupayaan membina negara bangsa bergantung kepada perkongsian nilai integriti, kebolehan, dedikasi dan kesetiaan.


Pemimpin dan rakyat perlu memahami dan menghayati lapan nilai 1Malaysia, iaitu budaya kecemerlangan, ketabahan, rendah hati, penerimaan, kesetiaan, meritokrasi, pendidikan dan integiti.


‘1Malaysia: Rakyat didahulukan, Pencapaian diutamakan’

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

True Malaysian

An article by Dr.Agoes which was published in NST on 12/5/2009. Best and honest writing i've read so far on racial matters in Malaysia. I could not have agree more with Dr.Agoes. At least i know in Malaysia there is still relevant Malays who speak with their soul and not with their arrogance.

Dominating role not healthy for nation, says Dr Agoes

I THINK we are farther apart now than we were in 1969.

But you have to remember that I grew up going to an English school, to a university where there were people of all races. At that time, although we did think in terms of race, it wasn’t in the way people do now. We felt that we were Malayans. We socialised much better than we do now. Bahasa Malaysia can be a unifying factor. But it can be a factor separating people, too.

As Sukarno would say, “The important thing is the jiwa.”You don’t have to have a common language, if you have the same jiwa (heart, spirit, passion, devotion). This is what we don’t have right now.In 1956, the historical society of Universiti Malaya went to India.

There were lots of Indians in the group, but they didn’t think of themselves as Indians, they thought of themselves as Malayans.That’s the jiwa.But later on, because of certain reactions, suddenly people stayed away from this jiwa — they don’t feel as though they are fully Malaysian.

They are made to feel that way.When I was in the service, there were lots of non-Malays in the civil service, holding good positions. But do you see them now? If you go to the universities, where are the non-Malay professors?

After 1969, suddenly there was this drive to make sure that all university vice-chancellors and faculty deans were Malay. So, in the end, we chased away all the best brains among the non-Malays.When schools say you must start school with a doa (Muslim prayer recitation), you push away all the non-Muslims. When I was at school, we never had any prayers. Whatever we learnt in religious class was a separate thing.I think it’s more important that we bring people together, rather than pushing religion so hard that it alienates other people.

This is what’s happening. I can’t blame the Chinese and Indians; why should they go to a sekolah kebangsaan (national school), when they have to do all these things?All the things are breaking down. Our school system is not as it used to be.

We are producing supposedly so many students with so many As, but what do they know? Are we happy about it? The leaders seem to be happy about it.We came up with the Rukun Negara because, after 1969, there was the feeling that the nation was breaking down.

People had forgotten what it was all about. So, we thought we could bring people back together — unite them. That’s what the first part of the Rukun Negara is about: the objectives of the nation.Unfortunately, we did practically nothing to promote an understanding of the Rukun Negara. And when schools make mistakes, nobody corrects them. That should have been the role of the Department of Information.

In the beginning, Tan Sri Ghazali Shafie did try to apply the test of whether something was in consonance with the Rukun Negara or not. But then, the government just forgot about this.We are supposed to be a united nation, not only in terms of state, but also in terms of people: that they would all consider themselves as Malaysians, and that this was their country and their nation. We wanted all these people to share the wealth of the nation.

One of the things we thought contributed to ’69 was the economic disparities, joblessness.The New Economic Policy was a policy for all Malaysians; not just for the Malays. But we wanted to restructure the economy so that the Malays would come out of the rural agriculture sector into the commercial sector. We wanted Malay participation at all levels of economic activity. We wanted to uplift the Malays without reducing the position of the others. — “eradicating poverty regardless of less”. And this was supposed to be in a situation of growth.

Not just sharing the existing cake, but the cake must grow, so that these people also have the opportunity to grow.At the same time, we also hoped that the Malays would grow a little faster. So, they set this target of 30 per cent equity in 20 years.

I was not much in favour of that because I didn’t think it was achievable. I felt that participation was more important than wealth.We never thought that we would produce multi-billionaires. That was never the intention of the NEP. If some people can come up as everyone comes up, it’s okay. But it wasn’t supposed to be about some people getting contracts.We did say that we should have Malay millionaires just as we should have Chinese and Indian millionaires, but not so much so that you don’t have to do anything.

You must differentiate between dominance and domination. As Tun Dr Ismail said, “We want to be dominant, but we don’t want to dominate.”Dominant in the sense that we wanted the Malays to be everywhere; but not to dominate all the others. But we seem to be dominating; and I don’t think that’s healthy for the nation.

It’s not about taking your share and not caring about the rest.

Datuk Dr Agoes Salim is an an economist and first secretary-general of the National Unity Ministry. He is also former chairman of Bank Pertanian. He was on the public service secretariat of the National Operations Council following the riots and helped draw up both the Rukun Negara and the NEP

Friday, April 3, 2009

One Malaysia

Malaysia 6th Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak has started "Change or Be Changed" campaign in style when he was sworn in as Prime Minister yesterday -3/4/2009.

The last few sentence from his maiden speech to Malaysian as our country Prime Minister give us hope and promise but the most important part of this is to deliver what was promise.

The release of ISA detainees and the lifting of banned for 2 Political Party papers shows that he is committed to make changes that Malaysian has been demanding. The promise to relook and study on ISA will bring confidence from the people but these are all still promises and what Malaysian wants to see is deliverance of what was promised. I remember Pak Lah also made similar promises to change and reform but delivers very little and his performance on my account as Malaysian 5th Prime Minister is also not good at all.

"So today I ask you to join me in this task of renewing Malaysia. I urge us to rise to the challenge of building a One Malaysia. People First. Performance Now".

"Let us begin this great journey together." - Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak

I support One Malaysia, One Bangsa as this is the only way forward for our country, there's no other way. The sooner we realize this, the better we are equiped to face future challanges and to continually grow.

Let us hope and pray that Datuk Seri Najib will be the ONE to take our country to greater heights in all aspect let if be economic, social or political. Stability can only be achieve without discrimination. When all races works together, then and only then we will see real progress and success be achieve by our country.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

English for Math & Sains

It is increasingly becoming an issue for our country when we see quarrels from our educationist, writers & many other group on the teaching of math & sains at schools using English as the mother language.

In fact, Malaysia very own writer A.Samad Said criticise the use of English for math & sains. It's already been 6 years since English language is use to teach math & sains at all government schools in Malaysia. Why is it still an issue?

Bahasa Melayu is originated from Indonesia, so what is there to be so proud about?

A lot of people argue that as a Malaysian we must be proud and converse in Bahasa Melayu. OK. I want to be a proud Malaysia too.. i would like to suggest the followings to uphold the Bahasa Melayu in Malaysia.

  1. Al-Quran to be fully translated in Bahasa Melayu. No more JAWI.
  2. Reading of Al-Quran during prayers to be in Bahasa Melayu.
  3. All DOA recital must be in Bahasa Melayu.
  4. All dealing & transactions at any level must use Bahasa Melayu
  5. English names is not allowed for shops or other businesses in Malaysia.They must use Bahasa Melayu.

I would like to see if Malays actually will progress forward or backwards by conversing the universally use Bahasa Melayu!!!

Friday, March 13, 2009

An Ode to Malays

I totally support and agree with Mr Shaik Rizal.

Malay Rights By Shaik Rizal Sulaiman

The Malays are "technically" in power governing the country but it is also this same controlling group that demands the right to correct economic imbalances and disparities for its own race.What does this say about the "majority governing" Malay race for the last 50 years?

I dare say that most Malaysians (regardless of race) below the age of 40 would like to see all opportunities be spread amongst those who deserve it on meritocracy.

We do not need the keris anymore to tell others to be careful of what they say and do because in the survival of the fittest, the keris is of very little relevance!If we continue to hide under the "bumiputera" tempurung as most Malays have been in the last 50 years or more, the catch-up game will just get harder and the gap wider.

If we continue to expect without earning it, we will never learn how to be a race that succeeds on merit. There is NO substitute for merit. The Malay politicians continue to shout about Malay rights and bumiputera rights because the very nature of our local politics is sadly racially biased.

In this day and age, a great nation is built upon joint success stories, meritocracy and the combined hard work of its people WITHOUT any fear or favour of racially biased politics governing our daily policies. Sadly, the Malay politicians have ended up completely corrupt, racialists, twisted religious fanatics.

I am below 40 and as much as I love the "idea" that Malaysia is tanah tumpahnya darah orang Melayu, I can't help but also feel that this country is for ALL Malaysians alike including the Chongs, the Kumars, the Xaviers, the Singhs and Kaurs etc. who were born on the same day in the same hospital as me here in Malaysia.If we feel that WE (the Malays) deserve this country more than THEM , then WE (the Malays) should have shown them a long time ago that we deserve the "control all" status.We have to earn it.

The policies FAILED because the very concept of Malay rights or the NEP/DEB is like a double-edged sword. On one hand, it aims to eradicate wealth disparity but on the other, it has made the Malays oblivious of what reality is.

Our (Malays) success is only reflected in the "perceived" political power which today can collapse in a matter of minutes. I would also like to see my children succeed in their country, Malaysia, for reasons that true success should be based upon, which are merit and hard work and NOT because they are Malays or bumiputeras.

For as long as the Malays don't see this, there is very little point in fighting for Malay rights..It just makes us look more ridiculous. We have taken this notion of being privileged a bit too literally in that it now simply means we want this country and its fruits all for ourselves without accepting the responsibilities that come with it.

I blame the MALAY politicians for this because we want to only fight the cause without strategising for the true substance and need of the cause. We have been given fish all the while without being taught how to fish.It's funny how two different generations can be so diverse in their thinking and the recent elections proved just that. We are no longer concerned with racial problems but more so the never-ending Malay agenda issues.

The rakyat has spoken and the landscape has drastically changed. Is this change welcomed? Is it good?The answer is "NO". Because we,the Malays, have been caught with our pants down - we are not ready to compete on any level playing field (we can't even compete on advantageous grounds!). Even with three or five more continuing policies for Malay rights or bumiputera privileges over the next 50 years, we will still be in exactly the same position as we are in today.

The truth hurts and the truth will always prevail. And the truth of what's to come will NOT go away. I am cynical perhaps because I feel that Malay rights is NOT relevant anymore.The right to be safe, to be treated fairly, to have a world-class healthcare and education, to enjoy equal prosperity, to have good governance, to live in a clean environment and to be war-free is what I want for my Malaysia. NOT for MY race to be artificially powerful.

If we want the Malays to fail, then by all means continue the fight for Malay rights. Go and polish your keris..

Shaik Rizal Sulaiman

Posted by MalaysianUnplug @ Link to This PostpsIn recent months we have seen the Syariah Courts allowing quite a few Malays to exercise their rights to a third or fourth wife. Fair, the guy may be able to provide for the financial and conjugal needs of his wives. However, question here is when he has a dozen kids, will he be able to provide a decent education and life to his kids or will he demand for his "Rights" for subsidy and aid and be a burden to the govt and society.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Racism in Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia's first serious survey of race relations, in 50 years, shows that behind the façade of outward unity and peace, racism runs deep in this multi-ethnic 'melting pot'.
The telephone survey of about 1,200 Malaysians also found that the majority of the various races find comfort and security in their respective ethnicity and not in a common 'Malaysian' identity, as the travel and tourism brochures suggest.

"The findings are not at all surprising," said social scientist Chandra Muzaffar.
"This is partly because ethnic boundaries are real in our society and almost every sphere of public life is linked to ethnicity in one way or another."

The survey, by the independent Merdeka Centre for Opinion Research, also found that negative racial stereotyping was deeply entrenched.

For example, minority Chinese and Indians see the majority Malays, who make up 60 percent of the population of 25 million people, as lazy.

Chinese and Indians, who began migrating here in the early 19th century, make up 26 percent and 8.0 percent of the population, respectively.

It found that more than half the population does not trust each other. For a nation that claims to be a 'melting pot', only eleven percent of the respondents said they had eaten often with friends from other races in the past three months.

Thirty four percent said they have never had a meal with people of other races.
The survey found that 42 percent do not consider themselves Malaysian first, 46 percent say ethnicity is important in voting, 55 percent blame politicians for racial problems and 70 percent would help their own ethnic group first.

According to the survey, 58 percent of Malays, 63 percent of Chinese and 43 percent of Indians polled agreed that "in general, most Malays are lazy."

Meanwhile, 71 percent of Malays, 60 percent of Chinese and 47 percent of Indians agree that "in general, most Chinese are greedy."

Sixty-four percent of Malays, 58 percent of Chinese and 20 percent of Indians agreed that "in general, most Indians cannot be trusted."

The survey, commissioned by the semi-official New Straits Times newspaper and supported by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, is the first honest look at Malaysian society and the findings have left Malaysians gasping in disbelief at how firmly racism and racial stereotyping has become entrenched and accepted as a way of life.

The Merdeka Centre said the survey "gives an honest picture of the country's situation and inter-racial perception" and warns that extremists can take advantage of inter-racial fears and suspicions in the absence of a meaningful interaction.

The ruling National Front government of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi works hard to portray the country as an example of multiculturalism where Muslims, Hindus and Christians live together in peace.

But experts have been voicing concern that, increasingly, the communities were drifting apart and polarization of the races and a lack of social unity were on the rise.

They squarely blame the politicians and the country's race-based politics for the sharp rise in racism. The shocking findings have also prompted civil society to demand a ban on all race- based political parties.

"Let us outlaw all Malaysian political parties that restricts membership on grounds of race, religion or sex," said lawyer politician A. Sivanesan who is senior leader in the opposition Democratic Action Party, one of the four registered multi-racial parties in the country.

"It should be written in the constitution that only multi-racial bodies be permitted."
Others say the few multi-racial political parties are weak and unable to grow because of the strong domination of race-based parties over the political system.

"Social problems affect all communities," Sivanesan said. "Poverty, drug and crime are not specific to any one race. All races face the blight."

"What the survey clearly shows is that the various races live peacefully but separately," Sivanesan told IPS.

"Half a century after independence we are further away from knowing each other than when we startedàseparate schools, separate friends, separate lives."

Curiously, the survey showed that many Malaysians had vague ideas, not only of each other's cultures and traditions but also of their own.

Hari Raya Puasa was wrongly perceived as the Malay New Year by 32 per cent of Malays, 84 per cent of Chinese and 45 per cent of Indians --when the festival actually marks the culmination of Ramadan, the holy month of fasting.

Similarly, the Chinese New Year was thought to be a religious festival by 57 percent of Malays, 53 percent of Indians and a whopping 62 percent of Chinese respondents.

Despite the lack of unity, the country has enjoyed long periods of peace except for one race riot in 1969.

And unlike in some neighbouring countries where uniformity is enforced, Malaysia's minorities are not restricted and are free to practice their own cultures and religions and enjoy a vernacular education.

But, the government officially practices a policy of positive discrimination that favours Malays over other races in many areas -- from employment, education, scholarships and business to cheaper housing and assisted savings.

Private companies must hand over 30 percent of equity to ethnic Malays and a portion of housing and commercial property must be sold to them, these measures, collectively called the New Economic Policy or NEP, were started in 1970 to reduce the yawning economic gap with the Chinese community, which dominates business in this country, as in most of South-east Asia.
Originally designed to last for 20 years it has continued without check, sparking envy and resentment between Malays and non-Malays.

The government is aware of the deep divide and has taken measures to close the gap.
One experiment in racial integration is the 'Vision Schools' initiative where students share sports fields, assembly halls and canteens, but attend classes conducted in their own languages.
But the initiative is embroiled in controversy mainly because of the fear among Chinese and Indians that the vernacular education system would suffer and erode their identities.
A popular initiative, the national service programme, started in 2004, puts youths of all the races under a single roof.

Students are chosen at random and taken to camps for about three months in the hope that they will learn team work and absorb each other's culture.

But, the experts say racism is too deeply entrenched in official policies and the socio-political system for such 'half-hearted' measures to make impact.

"The survey's findings might be a bitter pill to swallow but it tells us who we really are behind the façade we show the world," said Sivanesan.